View full case

OPOSA v. FACTORAN

FACTS:

This case involves a complaint filed by minors, represented by their parents, along with the Philippine Ecological Network, Inc. (PENI), seeking to prevent the misappropriation or impairment of Philippine rainforests. The plaintiffs argue that they have the right to the full benefit, use, and enjoyment of the rainforests, which are of significant ecological importance. They claim that deforestation has resulted in various environmental tragedies. The plaintiffs seek to cancel timber license agreements (TLAs) granted by the defendants for commercial logging purposes, arguing that the continued deforestation caused by the TLAs would result in serious damage to their generation and future generations. They assert that they have a constitutional right to a balanced and healthful ecology. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, which was granted by the trial court. The plaintiffs then filed a petition for certiorari to challenge the dismissal order. The petitioners argue that their complaint states a cause of action based on their right to a sound environment under various laws and provisions. The respondents argue that the complaint fails to allege a specific legal right violated by the respondent Secretary and that the issue is a political question. The court declares that the case is a class suit and rules in favor of the petitioners, finding that the respondent Judge's order was issued with grave abuse of discretion. The petitioner files a petition for certiorari and prohibition against the challenged order.

ISSUES:

  1. Whether or not the petitioners have the standing to file a class suit representing their generation and future generations.

  2. Whether or not the complaint filed by the petitioners alleges a specific legal right and cause of action.

  3. Whether the right to a balanced and healthful ecology implies the duty of the State to provide sanctions for impairment of the environment.

  4. Whether the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) has the responsibility to ensure the conservation and proper use of the country's environment and natural resources.

  5. Whether the DENR is subject to law and higher authority in carrying out its mandate.

  6. Whether the complaint filed by the petitioners states a cause of action.

  7. Whether the case involves a political question.

  8. Whether the non-impairment of contracts clause in the Constitution applies in this case.

  9. Whether or not the non-impairment clause under Section 10 of the Constitution can be invoked with respect to timber licenses.

  10. Whether or not the application for tax amnesty is barred by prescription.

RULING:

  1. The petitioners have the personality to sue in behalf of their generation and the succeeding generations. Their representation is based on the concept of intergenerational responsibility regarding the right to a balanced and healthful ecology.

  2. The complaint filed by the petitioners alleges a specific legal right - the right to a balanced and healthful ecology, which is explicitly provided in the 1987 Constitution. The trial court's conclusion that the complaint is vague and fails to state a cause of action is erroneous.

  3. Yes, the right to a balanced and healthful ecology carries with it the correlative duty of not impairing the environment. Sanctions may be provided for the impairment of environmental balance.

  4. Yes, the DENR is the primary government agency responsible for the conservation, management, development, and proper use of the country's environment and natural resources.

  5. Yes, the DENR is subject to law and higher authority in carrying out its mandate.

  6. The complaint filed by the petitioners states a cause of action. The court finds that the statements in the complaint, including the introductory affirmative allegations and the specific averments under the cause of action, are sufficient to show a prima facie violation of the petitioners' rights. However, it is necessary to implead the grantees of the Timber License Agreements (TLAs) as party defendants because they are considered indispensable parties.

  7. The case does not involve a political question. The court emphasizes that the enforcement of a right in relation to existing policies and legislation is not a political question. The Constitution grants the judiciary the power to settle actual controversies involving legally demandable and enforceable rights and to determine whether there has been a grave abuse of discretion by any branch or instrumentality of the government.

  8. The non-impairment of contracts clause does not apply in this case. The court disagrees with the trial court's decision that granting the reliefs prayed for by the petitioners would amount to an impairment of contracts. The respondent Secretary did not even raise this argument in his motion to dismiss.

  9. The non-impairment clause cannot be invoked with respect to timber licenses. Timber licenses are not considered contracts and do not create irrevocable rights or vested rights. They are merely licenses or privileges granted by the state, which can be amended, modified, replaced, or rescinded when dictated by public interest or welfare. Even if timber licenses are considered contracts, they can still be cancelled or modified by law in the exercise of the police power of the state for the promotion of public health, safety, moral, and general welfare. The non-impairment clause must yield to the police power of the state. Therefore, the petition is granted and the order of the respondent judge dismissing the case is set aside.

  10. The application for tax amnesty is not barred by prescription.

PRINCIPLES:

  • Intergenerational responsibility - Every generation has a responsibility to preserve the rhythm and harmony of nature for the enjoyment of a balanced and healthful ecology for present and future generations.

  • Right to a balanced and healthful ecology - This right, incorporated in the 1987 Constitution, carries with it the correlative duty to refrain from impairing the environment.

  • Right to health - This right is closely related to the right to a balanced and healthful ecology and is also protected under the Constitution.

  • The right to a balanced and healthful ecology implies the duty of the State to refrain from impairing the environment and to provide sanctions for the impairment of environmental balance.

  • The DENR has the responsibility to ensure the conservation, management, development, and proper use of the country's environment and natural resources.

  • The DENR is subject to law and higher authority in carrying out its mandated duties.

  • A cause of action requires the existence of a legal right of the plaintiff, a correlative obligation of the defendant, and an act or omission of the defendant that violates the legal right.

  • In a motion to dismiss based on failure to state a cause of action, the court only considers the sufficiency of the facts alleged in the complaint itself.

  • The political question doctrine is no longer an insurmountable obstacle to the exercise of judicial power. The judiciary can review the decisions of the executive and legislative branches and declare their acts invalid for grave abuse of discretion.

  • The non-impairment of contracts clause does not apply when the argument was not raised by the opposing party and granting the reliefs prayed for does not result in an impairment of contracts.

  • Timber Licenses are not contracts and do not create irrevocable or vested rights.

  • Timber licenses are merely licenses or privileges granted by the state that can be revoked or rescinded when dictated by public interest or welfare.

  • The non-impairment clause under Section 10 of the Constitution cannot be invoked with respect to timber licenses.

  • Even if timber licenses are considered contracts, they can still be cancelled or modified by law in the exercise of the police power of the state for the promotion of public health, safety, moral, and general welfare.

  • Tax amnesty is a general pardon or forgiveness granted by the government to a group or class of taxpayers who committed tax offenses.

  • Tax amnesty is intended to promote voluntary compliance and raise revenue, and it is within the power of the legislature to provide for its grant.

  • The application for tax amnesty is not barred by prescription because the tax amnesty law expressly provides that it shall apply to all national internal revenue taxes for taxable year 1981 and prior years.