View full case

CONCEPCION ILAO-ORETA v. SPS. EVA MARIE

FACTS:

The complaint in this case was filed by the spouses Eva Marie and Noel Benedicto Ronquillo against Dr. Concepcion Ilao-Oreta and the St. Luke's Medical Center for breach of professional and service contract and damages. The plaintiffs sought damages for the failure of Dr. Ilao-Oreta to arrive on time for a scheduled laparoscopic procedure to determine the cause of Eva Marie's infertility. The procedure was scheduled for April 5, 1999, but Dr. Ilao-Oreta did not arrive as she was on a return flight from Hawaii and failed to consider the time difference.

The trial court awarded only actual damages to Eva Marie. However, the Court of Appeals held Dr. Ilao-Oreta grossly negligent and increased the amount of actual damages. In addition to this, the Court of Appeals also awarded moral damages, exemplary damages, and attorney's fees. Dr. Ilao-Oreta then appealed the decision to the Supreme Court, arguing that she did not act with gross negligence and that the other damages awarded were improper.

ISSUES:

  1. Whether Dr. Ilao-Oreta should be held liable for gross negligence.

  2. Whether the award of moral damages is proper.

  3. Whether the award of exemplary damages is proper.

  4. Whether the award of attorney's fees is proper.

  5. Whether the increase in the award of actual damages is proper.

RULING:

  1. No, Dr. Ilao-Oreta should not be held liable for gross negligence. The court found that her failure to arrive on time for the scheduled procedure was not intentional and that she had made earnest efforts to perform the procedure as scheduled.

  2. Yes, the award of moral damages is proper. The court held that Dr. Ilao-Oreta's failure to arrive on time for the procedure had caused the Ronquillo spouses mental anguish, thus justifying the award of moral damages.

  3. Yes, the award of exemplary damages is proper. The court held that Dr. Ilao-Oreta's negligence was gross and wanton, justifying the award of exemplary damages to deter others from committing similar acts.

  4. Yes, the award of attorney's fees is proper. The court held that the Ronquillo spouses were entitled to attorney's fees as they were compelled to litigate to protect their rights and interests.

  5. Yes, the increase in the award of actual damages is proper. The court affirmed the trial court's award of actual damages and increased it to the amount proven by the Ronquillo spouses.

PRINCIPLES:

  • Gross negligence requires a want or absence of care or diligence, or a conscious indifference to consequences.

  • Actual damages may be awarded for proven loss or injury.

  • Moral damages may be awarded for mental anguish caused by the defendant's wrongful act.

  • Exemplary damages may be awarded to deter others from committing similar acts.

  • Attorney's fees may be awarded when the defendant's act or omission compelled the plaintiff to litigate to protect their rights and interests.