View full case

FRANCISCO A.G. DE LIANO v. CA

FACTS:

In this case, the appellant, San Miguel Corporation (SMC), together with two other defendants, filed an appeal before the Court of Appeals challenging the decision of the Regional Trial Court. However, their appellants' brief fails to comply with the requirements under the Rules of Court, as it does not contain a clear and concise statement of the case, a statement of facts, a statement of issues, and an assignment of errors. The appellee files a motion to dismiss the appeal, citing the deficiencies in the appellants' brief. The Court of Appeals ultimately dismisses the appeal, stating that the procedural lapses justify the dismissal under Rule 50 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

The appellants fail to amend their brief and instead argue that the errors in their brief are harmless. The Court of Appeals denies their motion for reconsideration. Only SMC files a petition for review with the Supreme Court, arguing that the Court of Appeals erred in dismissing their appeal on technicalities and without considering its merits. They also contend that there are valid grounds to reverse the award of damages in favor of the plaintiff.

The Supreme Court discusses the purpose and importance of the appellant's brief, emphasizing that it should be prepared concisely and organized manner. The Court explains that the brief should contain a subject index, an assignment of errors, a clear and concise statement of the case, a statement of facts, a statement of issues, arguments, relief sought, and a copy of the judgment or final order appealed from. The subject index serves as a table of contents and facilitates the review of appeals, while the assignment of errors enables the reviewing court and the opposing party to identify specific errors that the appellant seeks to challenge. The Court stresses that a general assignment of errors is unacceptable, and the appellant must specify the aspect of the law or facts that the trial court erred in.

In this case, the appellant fails to clearly specify the alleged errors committed by the trial court. As a result, the Court deems the appellant's arguments insufficient as they do not adequately identify the aspects of the law or facts in which the trial court purportedly erred. The Court emphasizes that it is the appellant's burden to carefully identify and present clear grounds for the appeal.

ISSUES:

  1. What is the purpose of an assignment of errors in an appeal?

  2. What are the requirements for a statement of facts in an appellant's brief?

  3. What is the difference between a statement of issues and an assignment of errors?

  4. What is the importance of providing arguments in support of assigned errors?

  5. Whether the appellant's brief complied with the requirements of Section 13, Rule 44 of the Rules of Court.

  6. Whether the former Fourteenth Division of the appellate court could look into the merits of the appeal.

  7. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the appeal due to technicalities without considering the substance of the appeal.

RULING:

  1. The purpose of an assignment of errors is to inform the appellate court and the opposing party of the specific errors claimed to have been committed by the trial court. It serves to point out the legal contentions and named rulings that the appellant deems to be erroneous. The function of the assignment is to group and present the exceptions previously noted in the case that the appellant wishes to preserve and bring forward on appeal.

  2. The statement of facts in an appellant's brief is crucial as it provides the backbone of a legal argument. It should accurately state the facts admitted by the parties and the facts in controversy. The statement of facts should be supported by page references to the record, and disobedience may result in the dismissal of the appeal.

  3. The statement of issues should not be confused with the assignment of errors. While the assignment of errors specifies the legal contentions and named rulings that the appellant considers to be erroneous, the statement of issues presents the questions of fact or law that need to be resolved by the appellate court.

  4. It is essential for the appellant to provide arguments supporting the assigned errors. The mere elevation of a judgment on appeal does not create a presumption of error. The appellant must show satisfactory reasons why they are entitled to the reversal of the judgment. It is recommended to support the errors and reasons assigned with citations of authorities whenever possible.

  5. The Court held that the appellant's brief did not comply with the requirements of Section 13, Rule 44 of the Rules of Court. It lacked an assignment of errors, the authorities were cited improperly, and it did not follow the prescribed order. The Court emphasized the importance of strict observance of the rules and the duty of lawyers to comply with them.

  6. The Court explained that there are two modes of appeal from decisions of the Regional Trial Courts to the Court of Appeals: ordinary appeal and petition for review. In this case, the appeal falls under the ordinary appeal mode. The Court stated that the former Fourteenth Division of the appellate court could not look into the merits of the appeal because it was not properly raised in accordance with the rules.

  7. The Court of Appeals did not err in dismissing the appeal without considering its merits. The dismissal was pursuant to Section 1(f) of Rule 50, which provides for the dismissal of an appeal if the records are not completed within the prescribed period. The merits of an appeal can only be examined during the second stage, which is the study and report stage. The Justice in charge of completion is only responsible for overseeing the completion of the records and does not have the authority to examine the merits of the case. Therefore, at the completion stage, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal due to technicalities without considering its substance.

PRINCIPLES:

  • An appellant's assignment of errors should specify the legal contentions and named rulings deemed to be erroneous by the appellant.

  • The statement of facts in an appellant's brief should accurately state the admitted facts and the facts in controversy, supported by page references to the record.

  • The statement of issues in an appellant's brief presents the questions of fact or law to be resolved by the appellate court.

  • Providing arguments in support of assigned errors is essential to justify the appellant's contentions and present satisfactory reasons for reversal.

  • Appellants' briefs must comply with the requirements of Section 13, Rule 44 of the Rules of Court, including the proper assignment of errors, citation of authorities with page references, and following the prescribed order.

  • Strict observance of the rules on appeal is necessary to facilitate the orderly disposition of appealed cases and cannot be left to the whims and caprices of appellants.

  • The right to appeal is a statutory right, and a party seeking to avail of the right must faithfully comply with the rules. Deviations from the rules cannot be tolerated.

  • Appeals from decisions of the Regional Trial Courts to the Court of Appeals can be made through either an ordinary appeal or a petition for review, depending on the exercise of jurisdiction by the trial court.

  • The completion stage and the study and report stage of appeals in the Court of Appeals are distinct and separate.

  • The Justice in charge of completing the records of an appeal does not have the authority to examine the merits of the case.

  • The dismissal of an appeal due to technicalities during the completion stage is valid and does not require consideration of the substance of the appeal.

  • The negligence of counsel binds the client, even if the counsel is also an employee of the client corporation.

  • A corporate officer or agent may represent and bind the corporation in transactions with third persons, to the extent that authority has been conferred upon him.