View full case

CIR v. . CA

FACTS:

Pedro Pajonar, a member of the Philippine Scout, Bataan Contingent, became insane due to the Death March during the second World War. His sister, Josefina Pajonar, became his guardian, while his property was placed under the guardianship of the PNB by the Regional Trial Court. Pedro Pajonar passed away in 1988, leaving behind his siblings, sister Josefina Pajonar, nephews, and niece.

The PNB filed an accounting of Pedro Pajonar's property but did not submit an estate tax return. The BIR assessed the estate, and the estate paid taxes amounting to P2,557. Josefina Pajonar then filed a petition with the RTC for the issuance of letters of administration for Pedro Pajonar's estate.

Subsequently, a second assessment of deficiency estate tax in the amount of P1,527,790.98 was made, and Josefina Pajonar filed a protest with the BIR. Without waiting for the resolution of the protest, she also filed a petition for review with the CTA seeking a refund of the estate tax payment.

The CTA granted Josefina Pajonar's petition and ordered the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to refund P252,585.59. The CTA allowed deductions from the gross estate, including the notarial fee for the extrajudicial settlement and attorney's fees in the guardianship proceedings.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue filed a motion for reconsideration, arguing against these deductions. However, the CTA affirmed its previous ruling and ordered a refund of P76,502.42. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue then appealed to the Court of Appeals, but the appeal was denied. Consequently, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue filed a petition for review on certiorari with the Supreme Court.

ISSUES:

  1. Whether the deductions claimed by the petitioner are allowable under the estate tax laws.

  2. Whether attorney's fees incurred in a guardianship proceeding should be deducted from the Gross Estate.

  3. Whether the notarial fee incurred for the extrajudicial settlement should be allowed as a deduction from the gross estate.

  4. Whether the attorney's fees incurred in the guardianship proceedings should be allowed as a deduction from the gross estate.

RULING:

  1. The Court of Tax Appeals upheld its ruling that the deductions claimed by the petitioner are allowable under the estate tax laws. The court considered the American origin of the estate tax laws and the interpretation adopted by American courts, which allow deductions for necessary expenses incurred in the administration of a decedent's estate.

  2. The Court of Appeals held that attorney's fees incurred in a guardianship proceeding should be deducted from the Gross Estate if they are incurred for the settlement of the estate. The court considered the appointment of the Philippine National Bank (PNB) as the guardian over the assets of the deceased, which formed part of his gross estate.

  3. Yes, the notarial fee incurred for the extrajudicial settlement should be allowed as a deduction from the gross estate. The extrajudicial settlement resulted in the distribution of the decedent's estate to the rightful heirs, and the notarial fee was necessary for this purpose.

  4. Yes, the attorney's fees incurred in the guardianship proceedings should be allowed as a deduction from the gross estate. The guardianship proceedings were necessary for the distribution of the decedent's property, which formed part of his gross estate. The attorney's fees incurred in the guardianship proceedings were essential to the proper settlement of the estate.

PRINCIPLES:

  • Administrative expenses, executor's commissions, and attorney's fees are allowable deductions from the Gross Estate if they are actually and necessarily incurred in the administration of a decedent's estate.

  • Necessary expenses of administration are those expenses entailed for the preservation and productivity of the estate and for its management for purposes of liquidation, payment of debts, and distribution of the residue among the persons entitled thereto.

  • Deductible attorney's fees are those incurred by the executor or administrator in the settlement of the estate or in defending or prosecuting claims against or due the estate.

  • Expenses incurred in the administration and settlement of an estate in extrajudicial proceedings should be allowed as deductions, limited to those administration expenses actually and necessarily incurred in the collection of the assets of the estate, payment of debts, and distribution of the remainder among those entitled thereto.

  • Judicial expenses of the testamentary or intestate proceedings, which include notarial fees for extrajudicial settlements and attorney's fees in guardianship proceedings, may be deducted from the gross estate for purposes of determining the net estate.

  • Administration expenses, as an allowable deduction from the gross estate, include expenses essential to the collection of assets, payment of debts, and distribution of the property to the rightful beneficiaries.

  • Expenditures incurred for the individual benefit of the heirs, devisees, or legatees are not deductible as administration expenses.

  • Premiums paid on a bond filed by an administrator are not deductible as an expense of administration.

  • Attorney's fees incident to litigation incurred by the heirs in asserting their rights cannot be claimed as a deduction from the gross estate.