FACTS:

Accused-appellant Danilo Tayag is appealing his conviction for forcible abduction with rape against a 9-year-old girl named Lazel Tan. The prosecution claims that on February 23, 1991, Tayag abducted Lazel by covering her mouth with a towel. He then took her to a coconut tree, tied her up, and assaulted her. Lazel managed to escape and ran home but did not disclose the incident out of fear.

The following day, Lazel confided in a classmate who promptly reported it to their teacher. This led to a police report being filed and a medical examination being conducted. When the accused was apprehended in 1994, Lazel positively identified him as the person who committed the crime.

Tayag denies the charges and argues that he is not the person mentioned in Lazel's statement. He claims that the charges are a result of his common-law wife's animosity towards him. However, the trial court convicted Tayag, dismissing his defense and considering Lazel's testimony.

ISSUES:

1. Whether or not the accused is guilty of forcible abduction with rape.

RULING:

1. The accused is guilty of forcible abduction with rape.

PRINCIPLES:

• In cases involving sexual offenses, the credible testimony of the victim is sufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, especially when the testimony is consistent, straightforward, and corroborated by medical findings.

• The defense of denial and alibi cannot prevail over the positive identification of the accused by the victim and the lack of conclusive evidence supporting the defense.

• Filial relationship alone does not affect the credibility of a witness. It is for the court to determine the credibility of a witness based on the facts and evidence presented.