View full case

FUJI TELEVISION NETWORK v. ARLENE S. ESPIRITU

FACTS:

In 2005, Arlene S. Espiritu ("Arlene") began working for Fuji Television Network, Inc. ("Fuji") as a news correspondent/producer responsible for reporting Philippine news to Fuji through its Manila Bureau field office. Her employment contract, initially for one year, was renewed annually with salary adjustments each time. In January 2009, Arlene was diagnosed with lung cancer and notified Fuji of her condition. Fuji, through its Chief of News Agency, Yoshiki Aoki, expressed concerns about renewing her contract due to her illness, despite Arlene's insistence that she was fit to work as confirmed by her physician. Eventually, the parties signed a non-renewal contract on May 5, 2009, effective upon her contract's expiration on May 31, 2009, with an attached release of liabilities and responsibilities. Arlene received $18,050.00, which she acknowledged under protest. Arlene then filed a complaint for illegal dismissal and attorney's fees, claiming coercion in signing the non-renewal contract and alleging that her salaries for March and April 2009 were withheld to force her compliance. Labor Arbiter Corazon C. Borbolla dismissed the complaint, ruling that Arlene was an independent contractor based on the four-fold test. Arlene appealed to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), which reversed the Labor Arbiter's decision and declared Arlene a regular employee, ordering Fuji to pay backwages from her dismissal date. The Court of Appeals affirmed the NLRC's decision with modifications, ordering Arlene's reinstatement and awarding backwages, bonuses, and damages. Fuji's motion for reconsideration was denied, prompting them to file a petition for review, which is subject to this decision.

ISSUES:

  1. Whether the petition for review should be dismissed due to the lack of proper authorization for the signatory of the verification and certification against forum shopping.

  2. Whether the Court of Appeals correctly determined that no grave abuse of discretion was committed by the National Labor Relations Commission when it ruled that Arlene was a regular employee, not an independent contractor, and that she was illegally dismissed.

  3. Whether the Court of Appeals properly modified the National Labor Relations Commission's decision by awarding reinstatement, damages, and attorney's fees.

RULING:

  1. The petition should be dismissed The Supreme Court ruled that Fuji substantially complied with the requirements for verification and certification against forum shopping. The Court found that there was authority for Corazon Acerden to sign on behalf of Fuji, and that further delegation of authority was not prohibited. Thus, the procedural requirements were met.

  2. Arlene was a regular employee and was illegally dismissed The Court of Appeals did not err in its findings that Arlene was a regular employee and not an independent contractor. Applying the four-fold test, the elements of selection and engagement, payment of wages, power of dismissal, and power of control supported the conclusion that Arlene was a regular employee. She was not hired for unique skills that set her apart from ordinary employees, and her duties and conditions of work indicated an employer-employee relationship. Arlene's dismissal did not comply with due process requirements, particularly as prescribed for dismissals based on disease.

  3. Modification of National Labor Relations Commission's decision by awarding reinstatement, damages, and attorney's fees was proper The Court found that there was no basis for awarding separation pay in lieu of reinstatement. No evidence supported the claim of strained relations, and the other conditions for awarding separation pay instead of reinstatement were not met. The award of moral and exemplary damages and attorney's fees by the Court of Appeals was upheld due to the unlawful withholding of Arlene's benefits and the oppressive manner of her dismissal.

PRINCIPLES:

  • Employer-Employee Relationship Determined using the four-fold test: selection and engagement, payment of wages, power of dismissal, and control over the employee's work.

  • Regular Employment Employment is deemed regular if the work is necessary or desirable in the usual course of business unless based on fixed-term employment freely entered into by parties on equal footing.

  • Security of Tenure Employees cannot be dismissed without just or authorized cause and due process. The right to security of tenure is constitutionally protected.

  • Illegal Dismissal Occurs when an employee's services are terminated without just or authorized cause and without due process. An illegally dismissed employee is entitled to reinstatement, backwages, and other benefits.

  • Quitclaims Do not bar employees from filing complaints for illegal dismissal if signed under duress, undue pressure, or necessity.

  • Award of Damages Moral and exemplary damages may be awarded in cases of bad faith or oppressive dismissal practices, and attorney's fees are justified in cases of unlawful withholding of wages.