FACTS:
The case involves a petition for escheat filed by the Republic of the Philippines. The petitioner argues that the respondent, David Rey Guzman, a natural-born American citizen, acquired one-half interest in several parcels of land through two quitclaim deeds executed by his mother, Helen Meyers Guzman. The petitioner argues that this acquisition does not fall under the exceptions provided by the Constitution for the transfer of private lands to foreigners. The trial court dismissed the petition, ruling that the quitclaim deeds had no legal force and effect and that the ownership of the property remained with Helen. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's dismissal. The petitioner argues that the quitclaim deeds are actually donations inter vivos, while the respondent argues that he acquired the property by right of accretion and that the deeds merely declared Helen's intention to renounce her share in the property.
ISSUES:
-
Whether David Rey Guzman validly acquired one-half interest in the parcels of land through the two deeds of quitclaim.
-
Whether the conveyance made by Helen to David can be considered as a donation inter vivos.
RULING:
-
No, David Rey Guzman did not validly acquire one-half interest in the parcels of land through the two deeds of quitclaim. The Supreme Court held that the two deeds of quitclaim executed by Helen Guzman had no legal force and effect, so the ownership of the property remained with her.
-
Yes, the conveyance made by Helen to David can be considered as a donation inter vivos. The Supreme Court found that all the essential elements of a donation were present in the conveyance made by Helen to David. Therefore, it can be considered as a valid donation.
PRINCIPLES:
-
Only Filipino citizens can acquire private lands in the Philippines, except in cases of hereditary succession or if a former natural-born citizen who lost his Philippine citizenship. (Art. XII, Sec. 7 and 8, Philippine Constitution)
-
Essential elements of donation: (a) reduction of the patrimony of the donor, (b) increase in the patrimony of the donee, and (c) intent to do an act of liberality or animus donandi.