View full case

ORIENT HOPE AGENCIES v. MICHAEL E. JARA

FACTS:

Michael Jara, a seafarer employed by Orient Hope on behalf of Zeo Marine, served as an engine cadet on board M/V Orchid Sun. On July 12, 2007, the ship sank, causing Jara to sustain leg injuries. He underwent medical treatment in Oman and was later repatriated to Manila and admitted to Metropolitan Hospital. Jara filed a complaint for total permanent disability benefits, claiming that his assessment was issued beyond the 120-day period. The Labor Arbiter, National Labor Relations Commission, and Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Jara, stating that he is entitled to permanent disability benefits due to the delayed assessment. Orient Hope and/or Zeo Marine filed a petition before the Supreme Court, arguing that Jara's disability should not be deemed permanent and total because of the grade given by their physician. They also claimed that Jara failed to comply with the procedure of seeking a third physician's opinion. The Supreme Court denied the petition and affirmed the Court of Appeals' decision, finding that Jara's assessment was issued after the 240-day period, and awarded moral and exemplary damages. The Court concluded that there was grave abuse of discretion in ruling that Jara is entitled to only a Grade 11 disability compensation.

In this case, the petitioner argued that there was grave abuse of discretion on the part of the respondent company in disregarding the failure of the company-designated physician to issue a final medical assessment within the 240-day extended period. The Supreme Court discussed the interplay between the relevant provisions of the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration-Standard Employment Contract, Labor Code, and its implementing rules. It was found that the respondent's uncooperativeness with the prescribed medical therapy justified the application of the 240-day extended treatment period. The respondent failed to comply with scheduled therapy sessions and disregarded the limited time the company-designated physician had to finalize the assessment.

In another case, a seafarer underwent a surgical procedure 159 days after repatriation. The company-designated physician did not issue a medical assessment within the 120-day period. The Court established guidelines for determining permanent and total disability benefits, which required the physician to issue a final assessment within 120 days. In this case, the need for further medical treatment was justified by the surgical procedure, extending the treatment period.

ISSUES:

  1. Whether the seafarer is entitled to permanent and total disability benefits despite the Grade 8 disability rating given by the company-designated physician.

  2. Whether the complaint filed by the seafarer is timely and has a cause of action.

  3. Whether the assessment of the company-designated physician is complete and definite, as required by the POEA-SEC.

  4. Whether the findings of the company-designated physician are supported by sufficient basis and comply with prevailing scientific findings.

  5. Whether a partial and permanent disability can be considered as total and permanent when the company-designated physician fails to give a definite assessment within the prescribed periods.

  6. Whether a seafarer can be deemed totally and permanently disabled if his illness or injury prevents him from engaging in gainful employment for more than 120 or 240 days.

  7. Whether the respondent is entitled to permanent and total disability compensation.

  8. Whether the non-compliance with the third-doctor-referral provision will prejudice the respondent's claim.

  9. Whether the respondent is entitled to disability benefits and damages.

  10. Whether the petitioners acted in bad faith in handling the respondent's case.

RULING:

  1. Yes, the seafarer is entitled to permanent and total disability benefits. The company-designated physician failed to issue a final medical assessment within the 120-day period, but the surgical procedure performed on the seafarer shows that his condition required further medical treatment, justifying the extension of the 120-day period to 240 days. Thus, the temporary total disability period is extended up to a maximum of 240 days.

  2. The complaint filed by the seafarer is timely and has a cause of action. When the complaint was filed, more than 120 days had already lapsed and the company-designated physician had not yet determined the seafarer's disability. The seafarer is deemed to have already acquired a cause of action for permanent and total disability benefits.

  3. The assessment of the company-designated physician is not complete and definite. The report lacks explanation to back up the findings of the physician, as well as details of the progress of the respondent's treatment and the approximate period needed for him to fully recover.

  4. The findings of the company-designated physician are not supported by sufficient basis and do not comply with prevailing scientific findings. The assessment must be based on symptoms and findings collated with medically acceptable diagnostic tools and methods, reasonable professional inferences, and submitted medical findings supported by plain English annotations.

  5. Yes, a partial and permanent disability can be considered as total and permanent when the company-designated physician fails to give a definite assessment within the prescribed periods. The failure to arrive at a definite assessment within the 120- or 240-day periods prescribed under the Labor Code and the Amended Rules on Employee Compensation can transform a temporary total disability into a permanent total disability, regardless of the disability grade.

  6. Yes, a seafarer can be deemed totally and permanently disabled if his illness or injury prevents him from engaging in gainful employment for more than 120 or 240 days, as specified in the relevant provisions of the Labor Code and the Amended Rules on Employee Compensation.

  7. The respondent is entitled to permanent and total disability compensation. Without a valid final and definitive assessment from the company-designated physician, the respondent's temporary and total disability, by operation of law, became permanent and total. Thus, the Court of Appeals did not err in granting respondent permanent and total disability benefits.

  8. Non-compliance with the third-doctor-referral provision as provided in the POEA-SEC will not prejudice the respondent's claim. The third-doctor rule does not apply when there is no valid final and definitive assessment from a company-designated physician.

  9. The respondent is entitled to disability benefits and damages. The petitioners failed to provide the respondent with a disability rating from the company-designated physician, disregarded his condition, and only submitted a medical report with a disability rating when they filed their position paper. The court awarded the respondent US$60,000.00 as permanent and total disability benefits, P100,000.00 as moral damages, P100,000.00 as exemplary damages, and attorney's fees equivalent to ten percent (10%) of the total amount.

  10. The petitioners acted in bad faith in handling the respondent's case. They invalidated the respondent's complaint for his supposed failure to move for the appointment of a third-party physician, despite knowing that no prognosis was issued by the company-designated physician, demonstrating their disregard for the respondent's plight.

PRINCIPLES:

  • The company-designated physician must issue a final medical assessment on the seafarer's disability grading within 120 days from the time the seafarer reported to him.

  • If the company-designated physician fails to give his assessment within the 120-day period without any justifiable reason, then the seafarer's disability becomes permanent and total.

  • If the company-designated physician fails to give his assessment within the 120-day period with sufficient justification, then the period of diagnosis and treatment shall be extended to 240 days, and the burden is on the employer to prove that there is sufficient justification for the extension.

  • If the company-designated physician still fails to give his assessment within the extended period of 240 days, then the seafarer's disability becomes permanent and total, regardless of any justification.

  • The 240-day rule applies to maritime compensation complaints filed on or after October 6, 2008.

  • A temporary total disability only becomes permanent when the company-designated physician, within the 240-day period, declares it to be so, or when after the lapse of the same, he fails to make such declaration.

  • The seafarer's failure to return to the company-designated physician for further consultation and treatment cannot be faulted if there is no showing that the physician required him to return within a specified period.

  • A final and definite disability assessment is necessary to accurately reflect the true extent of a seafarer's sickness or injuries and his or her capacity to resume work.

  • The assessment of company-designated physicians must be complete, definite, and based on sufficient basis to ensure proper evaluation and award of disability benefits.

  • The opinion of a seafarer's personal physician may be more reliable than that of a company-designated physician if it is supported by medical records and specialized knowledge and expertise in a specific condition or disease.

  • The assessment of a company-designated physician must comply with prevailing scientific findings and be based on symptoms, findings, and diagnostic tools and methods.

  • The determination of disability under the POEA-SEC is subject to the periods prescribed by law.

  • A partial and permanent disability can be deemed as total and permanent if a definite assessment is not given within the prescribed periods.

  • Even if an impediment is classified as partial and permanent under the Schedule of Disabilities, it can still be considered as total and permanent if it incapacitates a seafarer from performing his usual sea duties for more than 120 or 240 days.

  • The company-designated physician is expected to arrive at a definite assessment of the seafarer's fitness to work or permanent disability within the prescribed period. Failure to do so can result in the seafarer being deemed totally and permanently disabled.

  • Disability compensation is based on the seafarer's incapacity to work and impairment of earning capacity, not the injury itself.

  • Permanent partial disability assumes that the seafarer is fit to resume sea duties before the end of the medical treatment period and can still earn wages in the same kind of work or similar nature for which he was trained.

  • The 120- and 240-day periods provided in the POEA-SEC are accommodations for companies to determine disabilities of a claimant. It would be inequitable to grant them more time at the expense of the seafarer.

  • The award of attorney's fees is proper when the seafarer is compelled to litigate due to the employer's denial of valid claims.

  • Moral and exemplary damages may be awarded when the employer acts in bad faith or with deliberate concealment of necessary information from the seafarer.

  • Damages should be commensurate to the anxiety and inconvenience suffered by the seafarer and should discourage the employer from entering into unfair agreements with their employees.

  • Employers have a duty to provide seafarers with disability benefits and to handle their cases in good faith.

  • In determining the amount of damages, the court must consider the anxiety and inconvenience suffered by the seafarer.

  • Exemplary damages may be awarded to set an example or correct the wrongdoer's conduct for the public good.