View full case

PEOPLE v. SALVADOR TULAGAN

FACTS:

In the case of People of the Philippines vs. Salvador Tulagan, the accused was charged with sexual assault and statutory rape against a minor, AAA, who was nine years old at the time of the incidents. In September 2011, Tulagan allegedly used force and intimidation to lay AAA on a cemented pavement and inserted his finger into her vagina, constituting sexual assault. On October 8, 2011, Tulagan again allegedly used force and intimidation to have sexual intercourse with AAA, constituting statutory rape. Upon arraignment, Tulagan pleaded not guilty. During the trial, AAA's aunt, BBB, testified about witnessing a suspicious man near their house on October 17, 2011, and later discovered that AAA had been harmed, leading to AAA revealing the assaults by Tulagan, whom she referred to as Badong. AAA herself testified about the incidents, detailing the pain and coercion she experienced. Medical examination corroborated AAA's testimony, revealing a laceration and an abnormally dilated vaginal opening. Tulagan's defense was a denial and alibi, claiming he did not know AAA well and detailing his whereabouts during the alleged incidents, attributing accusations to a prior misunderstanding between his mother and AAA's grandmother. The trial court found Tulagan guilty beyond reasonable doubt, a decision later affirmed by the Court of Appeals, although with modified penalties. Tulagan appealed, challenging the credibility of AAA's testimony and the sufficiency of the evidence against him.

ISSUES:

  1. Whether the accused, Salvador Tulagan, is guilty beyond reasonable doubt of sexual assault as charged in Criminal Case No. SCC-6210.

  2. Whether the accused, Salvador Tulagan, is guilty beyond reasonable doubt of statutory rape as charged in Criminal Case No. SCC-6211.

RULING:

  1. On the charge of sexual assault (Criminal Case No. SCC-6210) The Supreme Court modified the lower court's ruling and held Salvador Tulagan guilty beyond reasonable doubt of Sexual Assault under paragraph 2, Article 266-A of the Revised Penal Code, in relation to Section 5(b) of Republic Act No. 7610. The court imposed an indeterminate penalty of twelve (12) years, ten (10) months, and twenty-one (21) days of reclusion temporal as minimum, to fifteen (15) years, six (6) months, and twenty (20) days of reclusion temporal as maximum, along with civil indemnity, moral damages, and exemplary damages.

  2. On the charge of statutory rape (Criminal Case No. SCC-6211) The Supreme Court affirmed the finding of guilt and sentenced Salvador Tulagan to reclusion perpetua. It also modified the award of damages, mandating him to pay civil indemnity, moral damages, and exemplary damages.

PRINCIPLES:

  1. Credibility of Witnesses

    • Testimonies of young rape victims are given full weight and credit, especially when the account of the rape is found to be straightforward and credible.

  2. Factual Findings

    • Factual findings of trial courts are accorded great weight and respect, especially when affirmed by the Court of Appeals.

  3. Legal Definition and Terminology

    • The distinction between acts of lasciviousness and sexual assault, as well as statutory rape.

    • The specific nomenclature and associated penalties under the Revised Penal Code and Republic Acts.

  4. Consistency of Testimony

    • Variations in minor details of a witness' testimony do not diminish credibility; consistency in the principal elements of the crime is paramount.

  5. State's Special Protection to Children

    • Refers to special protection against child abuse, neglect, cruelty, exploitation, and discrimination as mandated by Republic Act No. 7610 and other pertinent laws.

  6. Imposable Penalties

    • The appropriate penalties under the Revised Penal Code and Republic Act 7610 for lascivious conduct and sexual intercourse involving minors or demented individuals.

  7. Civil Indemnity and Damages

    • Mandatory award of civil indemnity and moral damages upon finding of guilt in rape or sexual assault cases.

    • Separate and specific awards for exemplary damages to set a public example and deter other would-be offenders.

  8. Legal Interpretation and Application

    • Adherence to the policy of providing stronger deterrence and special protection against child abuse as enshrined in the Constitution and laws.

  9. Jurisdiction and Legislative Amendments

    • Reminding and urging legislative bodies to consider amendments for clarity and updating penalties as per societal changes and judicial findings.