EN BANC
[ A.M. No. RTJ-06-2010, January 30, 2008 ]MARISSA R. MONDALA v. PRESIDING JUDGE REBECCA R. MARIANO +
MARISSA R. MONDALA, LEGAL RESEARCHER, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 136, MAKATI CITY, COMPLAINANT, VS. PRESIDING JUDGE REBECCA R. MARIANO, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 136, MAKATI CITY, RESPONDENT.
RESOLUTION
MARISSA R. MONDALA v. PRESIDING JUDGE REBECCA R. MARIANO +
MARISSA R. MONDALA, LEGAL RESEARCHER, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 136, MAKATI CITY, COMPLAINANT, VS. PRESIDING JUDGE REBECCA R. MARIANO, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 136, MAKATI CITY, RESPONDENT.
RESOLUTION
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.:
In the Decision dated January 25, 2007, respondent Judge Rebecca R. Mariano of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Makati City, Branch 136, was found guilty of misrepresenting that she had decided the case of "Amanet, Inc. v. Eastern Telecommunication"
as of January 2005 and of making inaccurate entries in the monthly reports. Respondent judge was meted the penalty of fine of P40,000.00, with warning that commission of the same or similar offense will be dealt with more severely. Respondent judge moved for reconsideration but
was denied with finality on February 27, 2007.
In the meantime, or on January 31, 2007, the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) submitted a Memorandum for the Court's consideration which contained the report of the team which conducted the judicial audit and physical inventory of pending cases at the RTC, Branch 136, Makati City, presided by respondent judge. The OCA recommended that respondent judge be directed to:
In a Memorandum dated June 8, 2007, the OCA recommended that: a) respondent judge be adjudged administratively liable for undue delay in rendering decisions and be fined in the amount of P20,000.00; and b) she be directed to decide with dispatch the cases covered by this administrative matter and furnish the OCA with copies of the decision within 10 days from its rendition.
In the herein assailed Resolution dated July 3, 2007, the Court adopted the OCA's recommendations and resolved to:
Moreover, she prays that the Decision dated July 25, 2007 imposing on her a fine of P40,000.00 be reconsidered in light of her admission of her oversight vis-a-vis the case of Amanet, Inc. v. Eastern Telecommunications, Inc. and her lack of malicious intent to deliberately misrepresent the status of said case and other undecided cases. She also prays that her 43 years of public service; the fact that this is her first infraction; her failing health and her impending compulsory retirement in October 2008; be considered as mitigating circumstances.
The motion for reconsideration is partly granted.
It appears from the records that the infractions mentioned in the Resolution of July 3, 2007 and for which a fine of P20,000.00 is being imposed, were the same infractions for which respondent judge was previously fined P40,000.00, pursuant to the Decision dated January 25, 2007. Accordingly, the July 3, 2007 Resolution is hereby set aside.
Anent the fine of P40,000.00 earlier imposed upon respondent judge, records show that a motion for reconsideration was filed but it was denied with finality on February 27, 2007. In fact, respondent judge has paid the amount of P40,000.00 to the Court's Cash Collection and Disbursement Division on April 11, 2007 per O.R. No. 7402054.
ACCORDINGLY, the Motion for Reconsideration of Judge Rebecca R. Mariano, Regional Trial Court, Makati City, Branch 136, is PARTLY GRANTED. The Resolution dated July 3, 2007 imposing on her a fine of P20,000.00 is REVERSED and SET ASIDE.
SO ORDERED.
Puno, C.J., Quisumbing, Sandoval-Gutierrez, Carpio, Austria-Martinez, Corona, Carpio-Morales, Azcuna, Tinga, Velasco, Jr., Nachura, Reyes, and Leonardo-De Castro, JJ., concur.
Chico-Nazario, J., on official leave.
In the meantime, or on January 31, 2007, the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) submitted a Memorandum for the Court's consideration which contained the report of the team which conducted the judicial audit and physical inventory of pending cases at the RTC, Branch 136, Makati City, presided by respondent judge. The OCA recommended that respondent judge be directed to:
On February 20, 2007, the Court noted OCA's Memorandum and adopted its recommendations. On March 15, 2007, respondent judge submitted her Compliance with the February 20, 2007 Resolution which was referred by the Court to the OCA for evaluation, report and recommendation.
- TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION on the following cases:
A.1. Cases without initial action since the time of filing:
CASE NUMBER TITLE NATURE OF CASE SP M-6253 In the Matter of Guardianship of Minor Kenneth Frank A. Tumanar, et al. Petition for Guardianship
A.2. Cases which have not been set for hearing for a considerable length of time:
CASE NUMBER TITLE NATURE OF CASE 1. 04-606 M. Mitra vs. B. Mitra Declaration of Nullity of Marriage2. 05-1080 C. Arinto vs. M. Arinto Declaration of Nullity of Marriage
A.3. Cases without further action for a considerable length of time due to the non-compliance by public prosecutors/parties concerned with the Court's directive:
CASE NUMBER TITLE NATURE OF CASE 1. 04-764 N. Galisim vs. G. Galisim Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 2. 04-815 R. Villanueva vs. C. Villanueva Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 3. 04-844 P. Salem vs. V. Reyes-Alonzo Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 4. 04-910 M. Medina vs. R. Medina Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 5. 04-1145 R. Perez vs. E. Mendoza Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 6. 04-1159 V. Beltran vs. J. Beltran Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 7. 04-1240 D. dela Cruz vs. J. dela Cruz Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 8. 03-702 E. Cayco vs. A. Cayco Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 9. 03-385 J. Garcia vs. J. Garcia Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 10. 05-1080 C. Arinto vs. M. Arinto Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 11. 01-665 Equitable PCI Bank vs. Phil. Wireless, Inc. Collection of Sum of Money with Prelim. Attachment 12. 06-047 F. Dumlao vs. J. Dumlao Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 13. 06-212 E. Ferrer vs. R. Ferrer Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 14. 06-468 M. Macatubal vs. S. Macatubal Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 15. 06-371 V. Alap vs. Z. Alap Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 16. 05-976 D. Felix vs. P. Felix, Jr. Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 17. 06-1094 G. Wessels vs. H. Wessels Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 18. 04-050 A. Ramirez vs. N. Ramirez Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 19. SP-M-6127 H. Bayudan, DSWD-Petitioner Petition for Involuntary Commitment to DSWD of Stephanie H. RApeda 20. SP-M-6158 Sps. C and E Payumo-Petitioner In the Matter of Adoption of Minor Von Alvaro Payumo- RESOLVE the pending motions/incidents submitted for resolution in these cases and FURNISH this Office copy of the resolution/order within ten (10) days from their resolution:
CRIMINAL CASES
CASE NUMBER TITLE NATURE OF CASE1. 06-1140
2. 06-1141
3. 06-1142E. Gipan, et al. Violation of R.A. 8049
CIVIL CASES
CASE NUMBER TITLE NATURE OF CASE 1. 99-1463 Lucena Industrial Corp. vs. Phil. Banking Corp., et al. Annulment of Mortgage and Foreclosure 2. 00-318 Iba Finance vs. Wijds Food Manufacturing, et al. Collection of Sum of Money 3. 01-071 Actron Industries vs. B. Perez Damages 4. 01-1506 Sun Life Canada vs. Ma. D. Sibya Rescission of Contract 5. 01-1656 Shorr Marketing vs. Manila Mining Collection of Sum of Money 6. 01-1665 ATR Professional Life vs. Loyola Life Plans Declaration of Nullity of Individual Insurance Coverage 7. 04-1031 E. Ariola vs. E. Azucena Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 8. 03-660 V. Cruz vs. C. Cruz Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 9. 97-3020 D. Padilla vs. China Banking Collection of Sum of Money 10. M-5413 PDIC vs. DCB Judicial Liquidation of Davao Cooperative Bank 11. 97-1035 Union Bank vs. Terra Marine Multi Ventures Collection of Sum of Money- DECIDE with DISPATCH the criminal and civil cases below and FURNISH this Office copy of the decisions/orders within ten (10) days from their promulgation/rendition:
CRIMINAL CASES
CASE NUMBER TITLE NATURE OF CASE1. 02-1877 J. Beltran, et al. Estafa 2. 04-2319 M. Nicos, et al. Grave Coercion 3. 05-1113 J. Payaon, et al. Theft
CIVIL CASES
CASE NUMBER TITLE NATURE OF CASE 1. 98-2433 Rotary Textiles vs. Sps. F. Ty Collection of Sum of Money 2. 99-1276 Allied Banking vs. MBL Factors and Traders, Inc., et al. Collection of Sum of Money 3. 02-1524 Subic Bay Distribution vs. Western Guaranty Corp. Collection of Sum of Money 4. 03-264 Protemps, Inc. vs. Ram Leasing Collection of Sum of Money 5. 05-835 H. Herrera vs. G. Herrera Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 6. 03-298 R. Gonzales vs. M. Devett Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 7. 01-1546 Metrobank vs. Ma. Batenga Collection of Sum of Money 8. 06-160 R. Vicente vs. R. Vicente Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 9. 02-102 BPI vs. Sps. B. Ong Collection of Sum of Money 10. 02-1018 Tokio Marine vs. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Collection of Sum of Money 11. 97-2840 M. Reyes vs. Bank of Southeast Asia Damages 12. 99-284 J. Sanatayana vs. Motivation Motors Collection of Sum of Money 13. 97-084 Prudential Guarantee and Assurance vs. Unknown Owner of Vessels M/V Hanjin Collection of Sum of Money 14. 92-2012 R. Tandoc vs. Pepsi-Cola Collection of Sum of Money 15. 95-1516 A. Capitan vs. Pepsi Cola Collection of Sum of Money 16. 02-057 N. Construction vs. Sps. H. Rivera, et al. Collection of Sum of Money 17. 95-408 Masaganang Sakahan vs. L. Po Collection of Sum of Money 18. 94-1292 Sps. E. Cruzado vs. Sps. B. Biluan Specific Performance 19. Spec. Pro. M-60-51 Sps. M. Konishi, petitioners Petition for Adoption of Minor and Change of Name 20. Spec. Pro. M-5987 I.G. Barona, petitioner Petition for Adoption- EXPLAIN within fifteen (15) days from receipt why she should not be held administratively liable for not resolving/deciding the following criminal and civil cases submitted for resolution/decision, within the reglementary period, to wit:
- D.1. Cases Submitted for Resolution which are already beyond the reglementary period to resolve:
CRIMINAL CASES
CASE NUMBER TITLE NATURE OF CASE 1. 01-071 Actron Industries vs. B. Perez Damages 2. 01-1506 Sun Life Canada vs. Ma. D. Sibya Rescission 3. 01-1665 ATR Professional Life vs. Loyola Life Plans Nullity of Individual Insurance Coverage 4. 04-1031 E. Ariola vs. E. Azucena Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 5. 03-660 V. Cruz vs. C. Cruz Declaration of Nullity of Marriage 6. 97-3020 D. Padilla vs. China Banking Collection of Sum of Money 7. 97-1035 Union Bank v. Terra Marine Multi Ventures Collection of Sum of Money
D.2. Cases submitted for decision which are already beyond the reglementary period to decide:
CRIMINAL CASES
CASE NUMBER TITLE NATURE OF CASE 1. 02-1877 J. Beltran, et al. Estafa
CIVIL CASES
CASE NUMBER TITLE NATURE OF CASE 1. 98-2433 Rotary Textiles vs. Sps. F. Ty Collection of Sum of Money 2. 99-1276 Allied Banking vs. MBL Factors and Traders, Inc., et al. Collection of Sum of Money 3. 02-1524 Subic Bay Distribution vs. Western Guaranty Corp. Collection of Sum of Money 4. 01-1546 Metrobank vs. Ma. Batenga Collection of Sum of Money 5. 02-102 BPI vs. Sps. B. Ong Collection of Sum of Money 6. 97-2840 M. Reyes vs. Bank of Southeast Asia Damages 7. 97-084 Prudential Guarantee and Assurance vs. Unknown Owner of Vessels M/V Hanjin Collection of Sum of Money 8. 92-2012 R. Tandoc vs. Pepsi-Cola Collection of Sum of Money 9. 95-1516 A. Capitan vs. Pepsi Cola Collection of Sum of Money 10. 02-057 N. Construction vs. Sps. H. Rivera, et al. Collection of Sum of Money 11. 95-408 Masaganang Sakahan vs. L. Po Collection of Sum of Money 12. 94-1292 Sps. E. Cruzado vs. Sps. B. Biluan Specific Performance
In a Memorandum dated June 8, 2007, the OCA recommended that: a) respondent judge be adjudged administratively liable for undue delay in rendering decisions and be fined in the amount of P20,000.00; and b) she be directed to decide with dispatch the cases covered by this administrative matter and furnish the OCA with copies of the decision within 10 days from its rendition.
In the herein assailed Resolution dated July 3, 2007, the Court adopted the OCA's recommendations and resolved to:
(a) ADJUDGE Judge Rebecca B. Mariano administratively liable for undue delay in rendering decisions and orders;On November 14, 2007, respondent judge filed the instant Motion for Reconsideration with Motion for Leave to Admit Motion for Reconsideration. Respondent judge alleges that the infractions for which she was being fined in the amount of P20,000.00 were the same infractions for which she was previously fined P40,000.00. She thus prays that the Resolution dated July 3, 2007 imposing a fine of P20,000.00 be reversed and set aside.
(b) FINE Judge Mariano in the amount of Twenty Thousand Pesos (P20,000);
(c) DIRECT Judge Mariano to DECIDE WITH DISPATCH the cases covered by this administrative matter;
(d) FURNISH the Office of the Court Administrator with copies of the decision within ten (10) days from their rendition; and
(e) NOTE the Letter dated June 19, 2007 of respondent Judge Rebecca R. Mariano, in compliance with the resolution of February 20, 2007 furnishing the Court with copy of the decision in SP Proc. Case No. M-6158, Civil Case No. 00-318 and Civil Case No. 03-264.
Moreover, she prays that the Decision dated July 25, 2007 imposing on her a fine of P40,000.00 be reconsidered in light of her admission of her oversight vis-a-vis the case of Amanet, Inc. v. Eastern Telecommunications, Inc. and her lack of malicious intent to deliberately misrepresent the status of said case and other undecided cases. She also prays that her 43 years of public service; the fact that this is her first infraction; her failing health and her impending compulsory retirement in October 2008; be considered as mitigating circumstances.
The motion for reconsideration is partly granted.
It appears from the records that the infractions mentioned in the Resolution of July 3, 2007 and for which a fine of P20,000.00 is being imposed, were the same infractions for which respondent judge was previously fined P40,000.00, pursuant to the Decision dated January 25, 2007. Accordingly, the July 3, 2007 Resolution is hereby set aside.
Anent the fine of P40,000.00 earlier imposed upon respondent judge, records show that a motion for reconsideration was filed but it was denied with finality on February 27, 2007. In fact, respondent judge has paid the amount of P40,000.00 to the Court's Cash Collection and Disbursement Division on April 11, 2007 per O.R. No. 7402054.
ACCORDINGLY, the Motion for Reconsideration of Judge Rebecca R. Mariano, Regional Trial Court, Makati City, Branch 136, is PARTLY GRANTED. The Resolution dated July 3, 2007 imposing on her a fine of P20,000.00 is REVERSED and SET ASIDE.
SO ORDERED.
Puno, C.J., Quisumbing, Sandoval-Gutierrez, Carpio, Austria-Martinez, Corona, Carpio-Morales, Azcuna, Tinga, Velasco, Jr., Nachura, Reyes, and Leonardo-De Castro, JJ., concur.
Chico-Nazario, J., on official leave.